Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Figure 2 | Neural Systems & Circuits

Figure 2

From: A novel, jitter-based method for detecting and measuring spike synchrony and quantifying temporal firing precision

Figure 2

Comparison of the Jitter-Based Synchrony Index with the Excess Count Index, the cross-correlation coefficient and the corrected Excess Count Index . In the left column of each panel, the indices and their linear regression lines are plotted for a range of simulations in which one parameter of the simulation was varied. (A) The rate of inserted coincidences, D, was varied; (B) the average firing rate, r (defined as the geometrical average of the mean firing rate of the two neurons) was varied; (C) the differential in firing rates, ∆r, was varied; (D) the amplitude of firing rate co-modulation, M, was varied. In the two rightmost columns, 1 s segments of simulated spike trains, representing two extreme values of the varied parameter, are shown above the cross-correlograms (CCGs) computed from the same trains. CCGs were computed in 2 ms bins and the counts normalized by the number of reference spikes. The black regression lines in B and C represent the corrected Excess Count Index (ECIcor); for clarity, the ECIcor data points are not plotted. In A and D, the ECIcor data points precisely overlapped the CCC. Note that the JBSI was the only index that was robust against variations in all tested parameters.

Back to article page